Back to blog

Agent vs Agentless Security: A Complete Comparison

AgentlessEndpoint SecurityArchitecture
Network Security Architecture

When building a security architecture, one fundamental decision shapes everything that follows: do you deploy agents on endpoints, or do you monitor from the network? Both approaches have merit. This article provides an honest comparison to help you make the right choice for your environment.

Agent-Based Security: The Endpoint Approach

What It Is: Software installed on each device (servers, workstations, laptops) that monitors activity, blocks threats, and reports to a central console. Examples include EDR, antivirus, and host-based IDS.

Advantages:
Deep Visibility: Sees everything happening on the host—processes, file changes, memory access, registry modifications
Encrypted Traffic: Can inspect traffic before encryption and after decryption
Blocking Capability: Can prevent malicious actions in real-time
Offline Protection: Continues working when the device is disconnected

Disadvantages:
Deployment Complexity: Must be installed and maintained on every device
Performance Impact: Consumes CPU, memory, and disk resources
Compatibility Issues: May conflict with applications or other security tools
Attack Surface: Agent software itself can be exploited
Maintenance Burden: Requires constant updates, can break with OS changes

Agentless Security: The Network Approach

What It Is: Security monitoring through network traffic analysis, without installing software on endpoints. Works by monitoring flows, inspecting packets, and analyzing communication patterns.

Advantages:
Zero Endpoint Impact: No performance overhead, no compatibility issues
Universal Coverage: Sees all network traffic including unmanaged devices
Immediate Deployment: No rollout process, no change management
OT/IoT Compatible: Monitors devices that can't run agents
Tamper-Resistant: Attackers can't disable network monitoring from compromised hosts

Disadvantages:
Encrypted Traffic: Can only see metadata and patterns, not content of encrypted communications
Off-Network Blind Spots: Can't see devices not on the monitored network
Limited Blocking: Can't prevent actions, only detect and alert (though integration with firewalls enables response)
No Host Details: Can't see internal host activity like process execution or file changes

Detailed Comparison

Deployment and Maintenance:
• Agent: Complex rollout, ongoing updates, compatibility management
• Agentless: Connect to network tap or SPAN port, minimal ongoing maintenance

Coverage:
• Agent: Only devices with agents installed
• Agentless: All devices on monitored network segments

Visibility Depth:
• Agent: Deep host-level insight
• Agentless: Network behavior and relationships

Operational Risk:
• Agent: Can cause system issues, crashes, performance problems
• Agentless: Zero operational risk to monitored systems

Attack Surface:
• Agent: Adds software that could be exploited
• Agentless: Passive monitoring adds no attack surface

Detection Capabilities:
• Agent: Excellent for endpoint-level threats (malware, unauthorized access)
• Agentless: Excellent for network-level threats (lateral movement, C2, exfiltration)

When to Choose Agent-Based

Agent-based security is the right choice when:

• Endpoint visibility is critical: You need to see process execution, memory operations, and file-level activity

• Blocking is required: You want to prevent malicious actions, not just detect them

• Remote workers dominate: Devices often operate outside the corporate network

• Encrypted traffic inspection is essential: You must inspect content inside TLS connections

• You have standard IT environments: Windows/Mac/Linux devices that can run and maintain agents

When to Choose Agentless

Agentless security is the right choice when:

• Operational continuity is paramount: You can't risk agent-induced system issues (critical infrastructure, healthcare, manufacturing)

• OT/IoT devices are significant: Industrial systems, medical devices, and IoT can't run agents

• Legacy systems exist: Older operating systems that agents don't support

• Rapid deployment is needed: You need security visibility immediately

• Attack surface minimization matters: You want to avoid adding potentially exploitable software

Learn more about agentless capabilities in our Definitive Guide to Agentless Network Detection.

The Hybrid Answer

In practice, most organizations need both approaches:

Deploy Agents Where Possible: Standard IT endpoints—workstations, servers, cloud instances—benefit from agent-based EDR for deep visibility and blocking.

Use Agentless for Everything Else: OT systems, IoT devices, legacy infrastructure, and as a backup layer for agent-covered devices.

Correlation is Key: The real power comes from correlating agent and agentless data. An endpoint alert gains context from network analysis. Network anomalies are enriched by endpoint telemetry.

This layered approach ensures you have visibility across your entire environment—no blind spots where devices can't run agents, no gaps where agents might fail or be disabled.

The Bottom Line

Agent and agentless security aren't competitors—they're complements. The best security architectures use both, deploying agents where they add value and agentless monitoring where agents can't operate or where you need an independent detection layer. Hypergraph provides the agentless component of this architecture, ensuring you have visibility into the systems that traditional endpoint security can't reach. See our complete guide to agentless security for implementation details.